Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236846›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

privateST: a feasible framework for privacy-preserving spatial transcriptomics prediction from histopathology images.

Hakin Kim, Miran Kim, Buhm Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hakin KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Miran KimDepartment of Mathematics, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. miran@hanyang.ac.kr.
Buhm HanInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. buhm.han@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) RS-2025-00553579National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) RS-2026-25495438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting spatial transcriptomics from histology images offers cost-effective insights but faces privacy barriers preventing cross-institutional data sharing. To address this, we present privateST, a homomorphic-encryption-optimized framework that substantiates the feasibility of secure spatial transcriptomics prediction. To accommodate the computational constraints of homomorphic encryption, we downsampled the input images using bilinear interpolation. To improve prediction accuracy for the 100 target genes, we incorporated predictions for an auxiliary set of 150 highly expressed genes. This approach enables the model to learn from a more diverse genomic context, thereby refining the feature representations for the high-priority target genes. To adapt the architecture for homomorphic encryption, we replaced Max-Pooling and ReLU with Average-Pooling and polynomial approximation, respectively. These modifications eliminate non-linear comparison operations, significantly reducing the multiplicative depth. We also implemented multiplexed packing to optimize the efficiency of encrypted data processing. Remarkably, our results demonstrate that despite the reduced input resolution, this proposed approach achieves accuracy comparable to the original ResNet-18 configurations without downsampling.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansPrivacySpatial TranscriptomicsDeep learningHistopathologyHomomorphic encryptionPrivacy-preservationResnetSpatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42236846
PMCPMC13473608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.