ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Longitudinal evaluation of serial ctDNA kinetics using joint modeling in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study applies joint modeling (JM) of longitudinal and time-to-event data to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics measured by liquid biopsy in metastatic breast cancer (mBC), with a focus on dynamic prediction. Unlike traditional prognostic approaches that rely on static biomarkers, JM captures the continuous evolution of a methylation-based tumor fraction (TF) and links these changes to clinical outcomes. Serial liquid biopsies from 49 patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative mBC treated with endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor were analyzed using the Guardant Reveal assay. JM combined a flexible longitudinal sub-model to characterize temporal TF trajectories with a Cox proportional hazards model for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). The most recent TF estimate was strongly associated with both OS and TTD (p < 0.0001), demonstrating an inverse relationship between TF and prognosis. These findings highlight the value of JM for generating patient-specific, dynamically updated predictions that may support real-time, personalized clinical decision-making in mBC management.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.