Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237097›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026

Gsformer: a dual-architecture deep learning framework with CNN-self-attention and sparse-attention for genomic selection.

Tingting Yang, Weicong Wu, Yahui Xue, Lei Zhou, Huimin Kang, Jianfeng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tingting YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1716-4726
Weicong WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.
Yahui XueState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Lei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huimin KangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Animal Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China. huimin_kang@fosu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3517-1880
Jianfeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. liujf@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD1300400Seed Industry Vitalization Program of Guangdong Province 2022-440222-4301030201-0019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic selection (GS) has revolutionized modern breeding by utilizing genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). While traditional models such as GBLUP and Bayesian approaches remain prevalent, several deep learning approaches have recently been introduced for plant GS, demonstrating superior predictive performance. Here, we introduce Gsformer, a novel deep learning framework designed to predict phenotypes by modeling complex genetic architectures. It features two distinct architectures: CSA, which combines convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with self-attention to capture local and long-range genomic dependencies, and NSA, which employs a native sparse attention mechanism to enhance computational efficiency by focusing on the most informative features. We evaluated Gsformer on six datasets spanning animal and plant species-pig, cattle, chicken, mouse, wheat, and maize-and compared its phenotypic prediction performance against five established GS methods: DNNGP, MLP, LightGBM, SVR, and GBLUP.

resultsGsformer generally ranked among the top two models across six diverse animal and plant genomic prediction datasets. Specifically, Gsformer-CSA yielded notable improvements in predicting cattle fat percentage, while Gsformer-NSA was more accurate in predicting chicken first egg weight, pig age at 100 kg body weight, and mouse anxiety. With the topN hyperparameter set to 20%, Gsformer-NSA matched or marginally exceeded Gsformer-CSA for most traits-though it showed lower accuracy for a subset of traits. Adjusting the topN value further enhanced Gsformer-NSA's performance, allowing it to match that of Gsformer-CSA. Ablation studies confirmed the complementary roles of CNN and self-attention modules in the CSA architecture. To enhance interpretability, we applied SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to identify influential SNPs and annotate candidate genes associated with growth and body size traits in pigs. Functional enrichment analysis revealed biologically relevant pathways involved in nervous system development, glycolytic process regulation, and digestive tract morphogenesis.

conclusionsIn summary, Gsformer establishes a flexible and powerful framework for genomic prediction, demonstrating broad applicability across both animal and plant breeding. Owing to its lower computational cost, Gsformer-NSA is recommended over Gsformer-CSA in scenarios where the minor sacrifice in prediction accuracy is acceptable.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGenomicsSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingCattleChickensConvolutional Neural NetworksMiceModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSwineTriticum

Identifiers

PMID42237097
PMCPMC13455463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.