ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Early motor inequities: how birth conditions and social context shape motor development in the first five years of life.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of individual factors (gestational age, birth weight, and body length) and contextual factors (socioeconomic status, school attendance, and region of residence) on motor development in children aged 0 to 5 years. A total of 626 preterm and full-term children were assessed using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition (PDMS-2). Most children (77.8%) demonstrated average motor performance, while 17.7% scored below average. Full-term children showed higher total motor quotients and fine-motor grasping scores compared with preterm children, and children with low birth weight performed more poorly in object manipulation tasks. Significant socioeconomic disparities were identified: children from higher-income families exhibited better gross motor and stationary balance scores. School attendance was associated with higher total motor quotients and superior performance in stationary balance, grasping, and visuomotor integration, underscoring the developmental value of early educational environments. Children residing in urban areas demonstrated higher scores across most PDMS-2 subscales compared with those living in rural regions. Overall, the findings reveal that both biological vulnerabilities and social environments play important roles in shaping early motor development. Early identification of risk and implementation of targeted interventions across health, education, and community settings are essential for reducing motor development inequities during early childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.