ReviewEnvironmental health : a global access science source2026
Not just splitting hairs-monitoring environmental chemical exposures, their biological effects and their social determinants with hair shafts and follicles: a narrative review.
Review in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans encounter a wide range of natural and synthetic chemicals throughout their lifespan and these exposures have a complex impact on health outcomes. Epidemiological studies provide compelling evidence linking chemical exposure to neurological disorders and various cancers. However, establishing causality between specific pollutants, or their mixtures, and health outcomes is challenging due to long disease latencies. Functional biomarkers in exposed subjects provide rapid predictions of the impact of environmental exposures. Notably, genome alterations, including DNA breaks and epigenetic modifications, are hallmark features of cancers, premature aging, and neurological diseases. Biomonitoring studies show that individual chemical exposures are specific. These differences highlight disparities across socioeconomic groups. They also present opportunities to associate specific environmental factors and disease development, as well as socioeconomic determinants of exposures and their consequences. This review focuses on biomonitoring environmental chemical exposures and their effects with hair and hair follicles. Pollutants detected in the hair matrix reflect cumulative internal exposures over specific time periods, while biomarkers can be analyzed in plucked hair follicles. These mini organs contain proliferating and stem/progenitor cells, which are critical to understanding the onset of various diseases. We propose an integrated approach that combines socioeconomic indicators, chemical analyses in hair, and biological assessments of matching hair follicles to evaluate the exposome and its effects on the genome. We discuss the state of the art of these approaches, their current limitations, and the perspectives they offer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.