ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Frailty among older adults in Germany: regional variation across NAKO study centers.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a geriatric syndrome associated with increased morbidity, disability, and mortality. While its prevalence has been studied extensively in individual cohorts and patient populations, national prevalence data are scarce and regional variations within Germany remain largely unexplored. This study examined the frequency of frailty and its regional variation across the 18 NAKO (German National Cohort) study centers using a uniform frailty index.
methodsWe analysed baseline data collected between 2014 and 2019 from 39,248 participants aged 61-75 years enrolled in the NAKO study, a large population-based cohort recruited across 18 study centers in Germany. Frailty was measured using a 40-item Frailty Index (FI), with FI ≥ 0.25 indicating frailty. Regional variations in frailty were first examined using crude frequencies and subsequently analysed with logistic regression, adjusting for key confounders, including age, sex, and sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, to account for compositional differences across centers.
resultsThe crude frequency of frailty in the total sample was 7.7% (95% CI: 7.5-8.0), while 34.1% were prefrail. Frailty frequencies showed a nearly twofold spread (5.4%-10.2%) across study sites, being highest in Essen, Düsseldorf, Regensburg, Saarbrücken, and Berlin, and lowest in Freiburg, Münster, and northern German centers. Higher age, lower socioeconomic status and weaker social networks were all independently associated with frailty status. However, while these compositional factors contributed to the variability observed across centers, they did not fully account for it.
conclusionNotable regional differences in frailty are evident across NAKO study centers in Germany, even after accounting for population composition (age, sex, and socioeconomic factors). This residual heterogeneity suggests that contextual factors - such as regional healthcare access, environmental exposures, or structural policies - contribute to frailty development beyond individual risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.