ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
Acridine-derived small molecule associates with VEGF and is linked to reduced CAM vascularization: a combined in silico and CAM study.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcridine derivatives exhibit diverse biological activities, yet their potential to modulate angiogenesis remains underexplored. This study evaluated 9-phenyl acridine (ACPH) as a small-molecule ligand capable of engaging vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and altering conformational features relevant to receptor recognition, with the working hypothesis that ACPH may modulate VEGF structural dynamics in regions involved in VEGF-VEGFR interaction rather than directly inhibiting receptor binding.
methodsStructure-based binding was assessed using AutoDock, PatchDock, and GOLD, with VEGF as the molecular target. Complex stability and conformational effects were examined by 50-ns molecular dynamics simulations, including RMSD, residue-level flexibility, compactness, solvent exposure, and interaction energetics. Functional activity was evaluated using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay at 0.04 nM, 0.4 nM, and 0.8 nM, with ImageJ-based quantification of vascular features over 24-48 h.
resultsDocking consistently positioned ACPH within a VEGF pocket, with predicted contacts involving Phe36, Ile46, Phe47, and Lys48 (chain A) and Cys60, Cys61, Asn62, Asp63, Glu64, and Glu67 (chain B). Across simulations, ACPH association was associated with reduced conformational variability of VEGF, particularly in regions relevant to protein-protein interaction, supported by an estimated ligand-protein interaction energy of approximately - 26.77 kcal/mol derived from trajectory-based and interpreted qualitatively rather than as a rigorous thermodynamic binding free energy. In ovo, ACPH exposure was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in CAM vascularization, with observable effects at 0.4 nM and more pronounced effects at 0.8 nM; however, this represents a phenotypic observation and does not establish VEGF-specific inhibition or a defined anti-angiogenic mechanism. Prolonged exposure at 0.8 nM was also associated with reduced embryo viability, indicating that non-specific toxicity may contribute at the highest dose.
conclusionsDocking and MD simulations consistently positioned ACPH within a transient VEGF cavity and were associated with reduced conformational drift and residue-level fluctuations. In the CAM model, ACPH exposure was associated with dose-dependent vascular reduction, with reduced embryo viability at 0.8 nM suggesting possible non-specific toxicity; these findings warrant receptor-facing validation and cytotoxicity-controlled endothelial assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.