ArticleTrials2026
Effectiveness and mechanisms of isometric resistance exercise to reduce blood pressure in a Chinese population: study protocol for a randomized-controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06510998 (Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Isometric Resistance Exercise to Reduce Blood Pressure in a Chinese Population), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Isometric Resistance Exercise to Reduce Blood Pressure in a Chinese Population: a Randomized-controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIsometric resistance exercise training (IRT) involves sustained muscle contractions without changes in muscle length and joint angle, such as wall squats. Patients with hypertension may prefer IRT because they are easy to learn, require no equipment, are convenient, time-efficient, and can be performed anywhere. However, IRT have not shown to reduce blood pressure (BP) as detected by ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM), the reference standard for BP measurement. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of an IRT program in reducing BP.
methodsThis randomized controlled trial (RCT) will involve 390 patients with a suboptimal daytime systolic BP of > 135-160 mmHg on a 24-h ABPM, who do not meet the current World Health Organization recommendations for physical activity. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the IRT (wall squat) group or stretching exercise (active control) group (1:1), using stratified and blocked randomization according to age (< 45, 45- < 60, and ≥ 60 years old), sex, and anti-hypertensive drug use (users versus non-users). Investigators will be blinded to randomization sequence and allocation. IRT group will receive a well-structured, widely accepted, and validated 24-week wall squat program (2 min per exercise, 2 min of rest between sets, and 3 sessions per week). Adherence will be monitored by regular patient communication via social media. The control group will receive the same treatment, with the exercise replaced by frequency-matched and time-matched stretching exercise. The primary outcome measure will be systolic daytime ABPM at 24 weeks. Secondary outcome measures will include other BP and ABPM parameters at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity at 24 weeks and 12 months, and flow-mediated dilation at 24 weeks and 12 months. Safety data will be collected and reported. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first adequately powered RCT to determine whether IRT can be recommended as a treatment for hypertension, involving a Chinese population. It will also contribute new knowledge regarding the mechanisms of IRT. This research has the potential to influence clinical practices. If positive results are obtained, this research could potentially alleviate the substantial burden on healthcare systems caused by poor BP control.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06510998. Registered on July19, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.