ArticleThe American journal on addictions2026
Do motives for and contexts of cannabis use interact to predict heavy cannabis use at the event-level?
Article in The American journal on addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMotives for and contexts of cannabis use (CU) are typically examined as independent characteristics of CU events in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies. However, theories posit that some combinations of motives and contexts (e.g., using to cope in a solitary setting) may contribute to heavier substance use than others (e.g., using to cope in a social setting). The current study aimed to test whether these combinations are associated with heavier substance use at the event-level. We aimed to do so among a sample of young adult females given sex differences in cannabis risk processes, which oversampled sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals due to their high rates of CU.
methodsWe utilized EMA data from a study of young adult females who regularly used cannabis (n = 571; 77.6% sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals).
resultsCoping motives and solitary settings interacted such that coping motives for CU were associated with longer and higher subjective intoxication but only in solitary settings. Social and enhancement motives did not interact with social contexts; however, social and enhancement motives, as well as social contexts, were associated with longer intoxication and higher subjective intoxication. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsFindings indicated that coping motives were only associated with CU when combined with solitary use. Social and enhancement motives and social contexts produced additive effects. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Findings indicate that studies examining the effects of coping motives or solitary cannabis use in isolation may not accurately characterize these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.