ArticleJournal of stroke2026
Combined Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet for Atrial Fibrillation and Cerebral Atherosclerosis: A Meta-Analysis.
Article in Journal of stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Patients with ischemic stroke with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) represent therapeutic challenges, and the optimal antithrombotic regimen remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy with OAC plus antiplatelet therapy in this population. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched through June 30, 2025, for studies enrolling patients with ischemic stroke and evidence of both AF and LAA. Outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Peto method, with random-effects sensitivity analyses, stratified by short-term (<3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) follow-up. Results: Eight cohort studies were analyzed. In the short-term, combination therapy was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.97; P=0.043), without a significant increase in major bleeding, although this association did not persist under random-effects sensitivity analysis (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13-1.07; P=0.067). Conversely, long-term combination therapy was associated with higher risks of major bleeding (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.45; P=0.002), all-cause mortality (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54; P=0.039), and composite outcome (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.27-1.74; P<0.001), without reducing recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.26; P=0.054). Conclusions: While long-term OAC plus antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding risk without preventing recurrent stroke, short-term combination therapy may offer benefits in selected patients with concomitant LAA, though this early efficacy signal should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.