Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237843›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2026

Gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women attending primary health centres in Puducherry: Results from the JANMAM pregnancy cohort.

Namita Patel, Haritha Sagili, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Balasubramaniyan Vairappan, Bharati Kulkarni, Lindsey Mina Locks, Subitha Lakshminarayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Namita PatelDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Haritha SagiliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Jayaprakash SahooDepartment of Endocrinology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Balasubramaniyan VairappanDepartment of Biochemistry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Bharati KulkarniICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Lindsey Mina LocksDepartment of Health Sciences and Global Health, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Subitha LakshminarayananDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives Inappropriate gestational weight gain is a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Women in low- and middle-income countries, often receive insufficient attention on weight management during antenatal care. We estimated the proportions of inadequate and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and identified the associated factors. We also examined the relationship between GWG and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted among 465 pregnant women recruited from six primary health centres in Puducherry, India. Participants were enrolled at less than 14 weeks of gestation and were subsequently monitored at delivery and two months postpartum. Multivariable linear regression identified factors associated with GWG, while multivariable log-binomial regression assessed the association between GWG and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results Total 408 women were included in the final analysis; of these, 48.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.6-53.5; n=198] had inadequate GWG and 19.1% (95% CI: 15.4-23.3; n=78) had excessive GWG. Women from joint families, nulliparous women, and those in higher socioeconomic classes gained significantly more weight (1.08 kg, 1.89 kg, and 1.57 kg, respectively; P<0.05). Compared to underweight women, overweight/obese women gained 2.4 kg less GWG (P<0.001). The proportions of caesarean deliveries, gestational diabetes mellitus, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions were higher in women with inadequate GWG (34.7%, 18.7%, and 10.4%, respectively, P>0.05) and excessive GWG (45.3%, 14.5%, and 16%, respectively, P>0.05) compared to those with adequate GWG. Interpretation and conclusions In our cohort, nearly half of the pregnant women experienced inadequate GWG, and only one-third achieved adequate GWG. The study identified family type, socioeconomic status, parity, and pre-pregnancy BMI as significant predictors of GWG.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainObesityPregnancy ComplicationsAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesRisk FactorsCohort studyGestational weight gainLow birth weightNeonatal outcomesPregnancySmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID42237843
PMCPMC13235565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.