ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Exploring the determinants of anemia in young adult women (20-24 years): the role of AI-based interventions in health management.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anemia is a deficiency disorder in healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin is a widespread health concern among young adult women, effects considerable impact on physical health, productivity, and overall quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, effective diagnosis and management remain challenging due to the complex interaction of the causes, intensified by limited awareness and inadequate health concern behavior. Objective: The present study aimed to study the determinants of anemia and development of AI App for screening anemia and management particularly for young women. Methods: A total of 545 women aged 20-24 years were examined in the study. A structured questionnaire was designed to acquire socio-demographic characteristics and to assess dietary and lifestyle factors influencing the probability of anemia risk. Blood samples were collected to evaluate key hematological parameters. Furthermore, an AI (artificial intelligence)-based anemia risk assessment and mobile health intervention was developed and effectiveness of the tool was evaluated using machine learning models. Results: Mild anemia constituted the largest proportion of the study population (50.3%), followed by normal hemoglobin status (27.5%). The machine learning model accuracy was 74.39% and human data diagnostic accuracy of the AI-based anemia assessment system was found to be 71%, respectively. Conclusion: This digital health approach also aims to enhance anemia awareness, prevention, and management. Integrating AI into anemia care holds promise for delivering accurate, timely, and personalized interventions, particularly in resource-restricted settings, thereby improving health outcomes for young women and reducing the societal burden of anemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.