ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural heart disease (SHD), including left ventricular systolic dysfunction, valvular heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and pulmonary hypertension, remains underdiagnosed despite the increasing availability of disease-modifying therapies. Echocardiography is the principal confirmatory test, but its broad use as a screening tool is constrained by imaging capacity, cost, and referral efficiency. This review evaluates artificial intelligence-enabled 12-lead electrocardiography (AI-ECG) as a pre-echocardiographic triage tool for SHD. We synthesize evidence across reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, valvular disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, pulmonary hypertension, and composite SHD models, and distinguish two intended-use orientations: safety-net screening, in which a positive AI-ECG result serves as an additive trigger for confirmatory evaluation, and gatekeeper triage, in which a negative or low-risk AI-ECG result may support deferring or de-prioritizing echocardiography in selected low-risk settings. Current evidence most strongly supports low-LVEF detection, where pragmatic randomized implementation and early economic data are available. Valvular and composite SHD models are promising for referral enrichment, whereas hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and pulmonary hypertension remain earlier or pathway-incomplete applications. We also review false-positive interpretation, stepwise confirmation with point-of-care ultrasound, threshold selection, workflow integration, equity, regulation, and health economics. Overall, AI-ECG is currently best positioned as an additive safety-net tool to improve case finding upstream of echocardiography. Gatekeeper use remains investigational and requires prospective pathway-level validation, calibration, and operational safeguards before routine imaging deferral can be justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.