ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
RESPIRE Score: Derivation and Validation of a New Risk Score for Prediction of Community-acquired Pneumonia Caused by Resistant Pathogens.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07425561 (Derivation and Validation of the Risk Evaluation Score for Pneumonia Involving Resistant Entities), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Derivation and Validation of the Risk Evaluation Score for Pneumonia Involving Resistant Entities (RESPIRE)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of infectious mortality worldwide. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens challenges the established empirical antibiotic therapy schemes. This study aimed to derive and validate a clinical score (RESPIRE) to identify CAP-MDR patients. Methods: We conducted an observational study in a setting of medium-high multidrug-resistant (MDR) endemicity. The primary outcome was the derivation of a clinical score predicting MDR-CAP. A retrospective derivation cohort (January 2022-December 2023) including adult patients hospitalized with microbiologically confirmed CAP by culture on respiratory samples was used for score derivation. A prospective cohort (January 2024-December 2025) including adult patients with the same clinical features was used for score validation. Results: The derivation cohort included 275 patients (mean age 68.3 years), with an MDR prevalence of 30.1% (n = 83). The RESPIRE score assigns 1.5 points for recent hospitalization and prior antibiotic use, and 1 point each for enteral feeding, poor functional status, and residence in long-term care facilities (maximum 6 points). A cutoff ≥ 2 showed optimal performance in predicting CAP-MDR (AUROC 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.91), outperforming other scores except DRIP. Validation in 141 patients (39% MDR) confirmed an AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-0.89) showing better performance compared to other diagnostic models. Conclusions: The RESPIRE score outperformed HCAP criteria and other clinical scores in predicting CAP-MDR. Its implementation in protocols could support antimicrobial stewardship for empiric treatment of cases of CAP presenting at the Emergency Department. A multicenter validation is warranted to confirm the performance of the RESPIRE score. Trial registration number: NCT07425561.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.