ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
A Reproducible Pipeline for Processing Commercial Wearable Step-Count Data in Aging Cohorts: Application and Evaluation in the STRRIDE-PD Reunion Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable devices offer the ability to objectively characterize free-living physical activity; however, raw step-count data generated by commercial devices require systematic processing before they can support rigorous inference. We describe a transparent, reproducible standard operating procedure (SOP) for transforming epoch-level step-count data from commercial Garmin devices into participant-level analytic variables and demonstrate its application in the STRRIDE-PD Reunion study: a long-term follow-up of older adults originally enrolled in a supervised exercise intervention trial. This data pipeline standardizes timestamps, reconstructs daily epoch grids, infers wear time from observed step patterns, and applies a prespecified valid-day threshold (≥10 hours inferred wear time) to generate participant-level summaries. Among 67 participants (mean age 71.4 years, 65.7% women), the median valid-day count was 10 days, median average daily steps were 5,794, and participant-level estimates were identical across ≥10-hour and ≥6-hour valid-day thresholds. Wearable-derived step counts were significantly associated with 9 of 16 cardiometabolic and fitness outcomes, including cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and lipid profiles. By contrast, self-reported exercise - assessed via a frequency-by-duration composite ranked into deciles - was not significantly associated with any outcome. A regression calibration framework applied to the full sample quantified the attenuation underlying this discrepancy: the naive self-report model systematically underestimated associations relative to both the observed Garmin model and calibration-corrected estimates. These findings demonstrate that measurement approach is a determinant of scientific conclusions in physical activity research, and that reproducible wearable data pipelines are essential infrastructure for aging epidemiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.