ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Levosimendan in Cardiogenic Shock: A Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Therapeutic Use.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Levosimendan is a calcium-sensitizing inodilator that has attracted renewed attention for a potential role in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). The pharmacological profile of levosimendan differs markedly from that of adrenergic inotropes: levosimendan augments contractile force without increasing intracellular calcium or myocardial oxygen demand and, through activation of ATP-sensitive (KATP) potassium channels, produces systemic and coronary vasodilation. Experimental and clinical data also suggest additional protective effects, including modulation of inflammatory pathways, anti-apoptotic activity, and improved mitochondrial function. Although these mechanisms translate into consistent hemodynamic improvement across several studies, large, randomized trials have not demonstrated a consistent survival advantage, likely due to differences in patient selection, treatment timing, and concomitant therapies. Nevertheless, certain clinical groups, such as patients who fail to respond to catecholamines, individuals on chronic β-blockers, and selected perioperative or mechanically supported patients, appear more likely to benefit. Therefore, current guidance favors an individualized rather than universal approach to levosimendan use. Several ongoing investigations, including trials in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-supported patients and those with septic cardiomyopathy, may help clarify the optimal indications and timing for levosimendan use. This review integrates mechanistic, clinical, and safety data to identify patient profiles most suited to levosimendan therapy and to outline areas where further study is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.