Evidence mapPaperPMID 42238634Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Cardioneuroablation: A Comprehensive Review.

Sergio Conti, Andrea Giuseppe Porto, Paolo Zappulla, Giuseppe Sgarito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergio ContiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6683-6781
Andrea Giuseppe PortoU.O.C. di Cardiologia con UTIC ed Emodinamica, Ospedale Cannizzaro, 95126 Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6454-6665
Paolo ZappullaDivisione di Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco", 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5014-5353
Giuseppe SgaritoIRCCS ISMETT-UPMC Heart Center, Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-6054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for functional bradyarrhythmias, particularly in cases of cardioinhibitory neurocardiogenic syncope and certain forms of atrial fibrillation. Indeed, by targeting vagal innervation through endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation, CNA can obviate the need for pacemaker (PM) implantation. This technique involves denervation of specific vagal nerve structures within the atria to modulate autonomic balance and prevent symptomatic bradycardia. The efficacy of this approach stems from the recognition that an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic tones, often characterized by excessive vagal activity, underpins these arrhythmogenic conditions. Indeed, CNA may be more effective than a permanent PM implantation in some patients, as this method addresses the underlying etiology rather than merely treating symptoms. Specifically, modulating autonomic nervous system (ANS) signaling through procedures such as CNA holds considerable promise for preventing and treating a range of cardiac arrhythmias. This review aims to synthesize current knowledge regarding various CNA techniques, exploring the associated mechanisms, clinical applications, and outcomes across diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

atrioventricular blockcardioneuroablationsinus arrestsyncopevasovagal syncope

Identifiers

PMID42238634
PMCPMC13227358

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.