Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238848›Full record

ReviewNew microbes and new infections2026

The potential role of indomethacin in COVID-19 management: A systematic review of therapeutic and mechanistic evidence.

Mokhtar Yaghobi, Milad Jalilian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in New microbes and new infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mokhtar YaghobiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Milad JalilianDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Indomethacin has been proposed as a repurposed agent for COVID-19 due to its anti-inflammatory and potential antiviral effects against coronaviruses. However, the available evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and largely indirect, with a large observational NSAID study dominating the sample size without evaluating indomethacin-specific efficacy. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251272994). Major databases and trial registries were searched from January 2019 to July 2025 using reproducible strategies. Eligible studies included randomized trials, observational studies, case series, and experimental investigations. Clinical and mechanistic evidence were synthesized separately, and risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Eight studies were included: two randomized trials, three observational studies, one case series, one in vitro study, and one pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling study. The largest dataset (n = 536,423) provided indirect safety data only. Small clinical studies suggested faster symptom resolution and shorter hospitalization in mild-to-moderate cases, but findings were inconsistent and at risk of bias. Experimental studies supported antiviral mechanisms, including inhibition of viral RNA synthesis and host translation pathways. No study evaluated prophylactic use. Conclusion: Evidence for indomethacin in COVID-19 remains limited and low certainty. Safety conclusions should be cautious given incomplete reporting and known NSAID risks. Larger, well-designed randomized trials are required.

Indexed as

COVID-19IndomethacinNSAIDsPreventionSARS-CoV 2Treatment

Identifiers

PMID42238848
PMCPMC13226820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.