ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
PerturbPlan: An analytical framework for designing Perturb-seq experiments.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR screens with single-cell RNA-seq readouts provide a powerful tool for characterizing the functions of noncoding elements and genes. However, designing these experiments to balance statistical power and cost is challenging, given the large number of design parameters. The only available tool for this purpose is a simulation-based power calculator, but it is computationally costly and requires high-performance computing to run. We derive a novel analytical formula for the power to detect perturbation-expression associations, recapitulating power estimates from the simulation-based tool while reducing runtime by up to seven orders of magnitude. This acceleration unlocks the possibility of interactive single-cell CRISPR screen design. Accordingly, we develop PerturbPlan, an interactive web application built on the analytical power formula. PerturbPlan helps users address 11 design questions for two types of single-cell CRISPR screens, Perturb-seq and targeted Perturb-seq (TAP-seq). We apply PerturbPlan to carry out a comparative analysis of three recent Perturb-seq designs, demonstrating how optimal design varies across experiments of different scales. We also use PerturbPlan to quantify the cost savings of a recent TAP-seq study relative to a hypothetical Perturb-seq study assaying the same perturbations, illustrating how the tool can inform decisions about targeted versus whole-transcriptome readouts. In sum, PerturbPlan is the first tool to facilitate flexible and interactive design of well-powered single-cell CRISPR screen experiments.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.