Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239268›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

HDAC INHIBITION SENSITIZES PANCREATIC TUMORS TO DNA DAMAGE BY GLOBAL REDISTRIBUTION OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL MACHINERY.

Gaoyang Liang, Hung V-T Nguyen, Jonathan Zhu, Hervé Tiriac, Hadiqa Zafar, Daniel Y Cao, Gabriela Estepa, Dylan C Nelson, Yang Dai, Tae Gyu Oh and 12 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Gaoyang LiangGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Hung V-T NguyenDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Jonathan ZhuGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Hervé TiriacDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5039-6750
Hadiqa ZafarDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Daniel Y CaoGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Gabriela EstepaGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Dylan C NelsonGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Yang DaiGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Tae Gyu OhGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Christopher LiddleStorr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia.
Ruth T YuGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Tony HunterMolecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7691-6993
Dannielle EngleMolecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Reuben ShawMolecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Andrew M LowyDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093, USA.
Weiwei FanGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Morgan L TruittGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Annette R AtkinsGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Jeremiah A JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Michael DownesGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Ronald M EvansGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Alan Saghatelian · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Project 3: The AMPK Autophagy Pathway as a Metabolic Liability in Pancratic Ductal AdenocarcinomaP01CA265762 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Susan M Kaech · 2023 to 2026
$14.6M
San Diego Nathan Shock CenterP30AG068635 · NIA · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SHADEL, GERALD · 2020 to 2024
$6.0M
Organic nanoparticles for dual MRI-guided therapeutic selection and ovarian cancer drug deliveryR01CA220468 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Jeremiah Allen Johnson · 2017 to 2026
$4.9M
Epigenetic therapy for pancreatic cancerF32CA217033 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI LIANG, GAOYANG · 2017 to 2019
$196k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA217033NCI NIH HHS P01 CA265762NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220468NIA NIH HHS P30 AG068635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development and therapeutic responses, including to genotoxic agents. While epigenetic modulators have been shown to contribute to the DDR, how chromatin regulation dictates responses to DNA damage in PDAC remains incompletely understood. Here, we identify Class I histone deacetylases (HDACs) as critical regulators of the DDR. HDAC1/2 directs the genomic distribution of H3K27ac, ensuring sufficient BRD4 and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy at DDR gene promoters. HDAC inhibition by entinostat shifts the balance of H3K27 acetylation preferentially towards intergenic regions, diverting BRD4 and Pol II from promoters, thereby suppressing DDR gene expression. In line with this, HDAC inhibition heightens DNA damage and sensitizes PDAC to diverse DNA-damaging and DDR-targeting agents. Since the clinical development of HDAC inhibitors has been limited by systemic toxicity, we developed bottlebrush prodrug (BPD) nanoparticles for tumor-selective entinostat delivery. Entinostat-BPD achieved tumor-specific HDAC inhibition while displaying potent efficacy and reduced systemic toxicity. These findings reveal an HDAC-dependent DDR vulnerability and offer combinational and precision targeting strategies to facilitate clinical translation and improve PDAC patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Biological Sciences: Medical SciencesBottlebrush ProdrugDNA Damage ResponseHDACHDAC InhibitorPancreatic CancerPhysical Sciences: Chemistry

Identifiers

PMID42239268
PMCPMC13228600

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.