ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
DamageFormer: a damage-aware multimodal deep learning framework for DNA lesion identification from nanopore sequencing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: DNA lesions arise from endogenous metabolism and environmental exposure and are the major drivers of mutagenesis, aging, and cancer development. However, mapping DNA damage at nucleotide resolution remains a technically challenging task. Nanopore sequencing enables direct detection of chemical perturbations through alterations in ionic current signals. Despite this potential, existing computational approaches remain limited in their capacity to generalize across diverse lesion types and to effectively integrate nucleotide sequence context with raw signal information for accurate detection and localization. Results: We presented DamageFormer, a multimodal deep learning framework for detection and localization of DNA lesions using native nanopore sequencing data. Central to this framework is LesionBERT, a damage-aware genomic foundation model built upon DNABERT-2 and enhanced with lesion-focused reconstruction objectives to improve representation of chemically modified bases. DamageFormer integrated LesionBERT with a neural signal model through an adaptive gating mechanism, enabling dynamic weighting of sequence context and nanopore signal evidence. The model was trained using a joint objective that combines prediction, localization, and contrastive alignment losses to promote cross-modal coherence and spatial precision. On an oxidative DNA damage benchmark comprising paired sequence and signal data, DamageFormer achieved an AUROC of 0.99997 for lesion detection and a mean absolute localization error of 0.00439, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Model interpretation analyses revealed context-dependent modality weighting that adapts to variation in signal quality and sequence ambiguity. The proposed framework further generalizes to chemically distinct guanine lesions not observed during the training process, demonstrating its robustness and transferability to unseen damage types. Conclusions: Damage-aware biological language modeling combined with adaptive multimodal fusion enables accurate and interpretable identification of DNA lesions from nanopore sequencing data. This framework provides a scalable approach for characterizing genome-wide damage landscapes and illustrates how chemical DNA information can be systematically incorporated into genomic language models. The source code and pretrained models of this work are available at: https://github.com/UF-HOBIYin-Lab/DamageFormer.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.