ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Assessment of China's food and nutrition policies based on healthy food environment policy index (food-EPI): focusing on governance, funding and resources, platforms for interaction.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: China currently faces the Triple Burden of Malnutrition, which includes persistent undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overweight/obesity. Although a life-course nutrition policy architecture has been established, implementation remains constrained fragile governance, inadequate funding and resources, and the absence of robust platforms for interaction. A China-adapted Healthy Food Environment Policy Index assessment is urgently needed to systematically benchmark policy comprehensiveness against international best practice and to inform evidence-based governance optimization. Methodology: This study evaluated three domains of China's food and nutrition policy-governance (4 indicators), funding and resources (3 indicators), and platforms for interaction (4 indicators)-based on the Food-EPI framework. An expert panel ( Results: A total of 15 relevant policies were primarily included. Overall, China's food and nutrition policies rated as medium across all three domains-governance, funding and resources, and platforms for interaction. Specific scores and implementation levels were as follows: governance 3.12 ± 0.98 (62.4%), funding and resources 3.23 ± 0.96 (64.6%), and platforms for interaction 3.46 ± 0.90 (69.2%). Among the 11 indicators, 90.9% were rated at a medium level, 9.1% at a high level, with no indicators classified as low or extremely low. Conclusion: China's food and nutrition policies have established a foundational basis in infrastructure support, resource allocation, and coordination; however, they remain in a transitional phase from framework development toward high-quality implementation. Future efforts should focus on optimizing resource allocation, strengthening professional support systems, and advancing data integration and sharing to further enhance policy implementation effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.