SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Evidence summary for optimal glycemic variability management during enteral nutrition in adult ICU patients with cerebral infarction.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically summarize the best available evidence on glycemic variability (GV) management during enteral nutrition (EN) in adult patients with cerebral infarction in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to provide an evidence-based reference for clinical practice. Methods: Guided by the 6S evidence-based model, this evidence summary systematically searched Chinese and English evidence-based resource databases, guideline websites, professional society websites, and literature databases from inception to April 1, 2026. Eligible documents were critically appraised using source-specific tools, and the best available evidence was extracted, graded, and synthesized. Results: A total of 18 documents were included, comprising 9 guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, 3 clinical decisions, 3 best evidence summaries and 1 systematic review. Thirty-five pieces of best evidence were summarized across five domains: basic patient assessment and screening, blood glucose monitoring and target control, optimization of enteral nutrition regimens, insulin intervention strategies, and multidisciplinary collaborative management. Conclusion: This study summarizes the best available evidence for GV management during EN in adult patients with cerebral infarction in the ICU. In clinical practice, individualized adjustments should be made according to patient conditions and local resource availability to improve the quality of GV management. Systematic review registration: This evidence summary has been registered at the Evidence Summary Registration Platform of Fudan University Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing. The registration details are as follows: Unique Identifier: ES20269922. Title: Evidence Summary of Glycemic Variability Management During Enteral Nutrition in Patients With Cerebral Infarction Registration date: 2026-02-13. The publicly accessible registration platform URL is: http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn/home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.