ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting the progression risk of HCC after lenvatinib therapy.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although lenvatinib presents promising results in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the treatment responses have distinct individual variability. To address this, we aimed to construct a prognostic model to forecast the risk of progression in HCC patients who underwent lenvatinib therapy. Accordingly, two hundred twenty-three HCC patients who received lenvatinib treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University were enrolled. Statistically significant parameters were identified by univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Subsequently, receiver operating curves (ROC) and calibration curves were plotted to estimate the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was carried out to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram by quantifying the net benefits under all threshold probabilities, and the bootstrap re-sampling method was chosen for the internal validation. Finally, tumor number, tumor size, metastasis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) and Child-Pugh grade were finally included in the nomogram to predict the 6-, 12- and 18- months progression-free survival (PFS) rates of lenvatinib-treated HCC patients. An unadjusted C-index of 0.725 and a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.689 indicated good prediction accuracy of the model. The AUC for 6-, 12- and 18-month PFS rates were 0.663, 0.677 and 0.810 repetitively. The calibration curve showed that there was a good agreement between predicted progression probability and actual observation one, and DCA indicated a favorable clinical benefit of the nomogram. In summary, Aa practical and well-calibrated model was developed, which could objectively predict the prognosis of lenvatinib treatment in HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42240665What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.