ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Impulse control disorder: patients with pituitary adenomas and dopaminergic agonists].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Impulse control disorder suggests a fronto-striatal dysfunction that impairs executive metacognitive abilities, as a result of dopamine receptor activation. Dopaminergic agonists serve as adjuvant therapy in pituitary adenomas. Objective: To analyze the frequency of impulse control disorder in patients with pituitary adenomas treated with dopaminergic agonists. Methods: Cross-sectional analytical study; ≥ 18 years old, diagnosed with pituitary adenoma, and receiving dopaminergic agonist treatment. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) was used. Proportions were compared using Chi-square; means with the Student's t-test, Pearson´s correlation for the strength of the association between each subscale. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated for risk calculations. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Forty patients were studied, 50% female, with an average age of 42.32 years. According to the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11), 40% showed cognitive impairment, 27.5% showed motor impulsivity, and 7.5% exhibited unplanned impulsivity. In total, 12.5% of the population tested positive. Seventy-five percent had a lower accumulated dose (less than 500 mg), with an average of 248.4 milligrams, and 60% had been on treatment for more than 2 years. Conclusions: A 12.5% incidence of impulsivity was observed based on the total BIS-11 score, with a 19-fold higher risk in women, and a tendency toward microprolactinoma presence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.