Evidence mapPaperPMID 42242005Full record

ArticleESMO open2026

DOSET: dose optimization with simultaneous efficacy and toxicity evaluation, motivated by a first-in-human phase I CAR T lymphoma trial.

X Hu, R Benjamin, C Graham, J Maher, C Yap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

X HuClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
R BenjaminDepartment of Haematology, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK; Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
C GrahamDepartment of Haematology, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK; Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J MaherDepartment of Precision and Population Oncology, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK; Leucid Bio Ltd., Guy's Hospital, London, UK; Department of Immunology, Eastbourne Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, UK.
C YapClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. Electronic address: christina.yap@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional phase I designs aim to identify the maximum tolerated dose, assuming higher doses increase efficacy, which may not hold in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. We present DOSET (Dose Optimization with Simultaneous Efficacy and Toxicity) evaluation, a novel adaptive design jointly modeling safety and preliminary efficacy to identify the recommended dose, minimizing patient exposure to subtherapeutic or toxic doses, informed by a phase I CAR T lymphoma trial with a small sample. MATERIALS AND

methodsDOSET is a two-part Bayesian adaptive design. Part 1 employs the continual reassessment method (CRM) with an initial 2 + 2 + 2 escalation across three dose levels to identify tolerable doses, allowing early stopping for excessive toxicity. Part 2 randomly assigns patients across selected doses, with ongoing CRM updates allowing dose adjustments as needed. Activity is evaluated concurrently with a Bayesian interim futility framework. Final dose selection is based on joint tolerability and activity. Simulations compared dose selection accuracy, patient allocation, and safety with the Bayesian optimal interval phase I/II design (BOIN12).

resultsDOSET effectively selects active and tolerable doses, allocates patients efficiently, and reliably stops when all doses are excessively toxic. Compared with BOIN12, it improves dose selection without compromising safety, maintains or enhances early stopping for futile or toxic doses, and provides greater flexibility.

conclusionsDOSET integrates dose escalation and optimization in a seamless framework, leveraging safety and efficacy data. Despite small-sample sizes, it offers an efficient and flexible approach to improve early-phase CAR T cell trials and applies broadly to non-monotonic dose-response settings, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, T-CellBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseReceptors, Chimeric AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenBayesian adaptive designCAR-T cell therapydose findingdose optimizationjoint efficacy–toxicity evaluationphase I trialseamless design

Identifiers

PMID42242005
PMCPMC13266000

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.