ArticleJournal of neuroendocrinology2026
Lateral hypothalamic melanin concentrating hormone-expressing neurons both promote and are required for cue-potentiated feeding.
Article in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food-related stimuli can promote feeding behaviors independent of metabolic need. Cue-potentiated feeding (CPF) studies in rodents offer the potential to reveal the psychobiological mechanisms underlying learned overeating behaviors. We examined whether lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) cells expressing the feeding signal Melanin Concentrating Hormone (MCH) are sufficient and necessary for CPF. Tg(Pmch-Cre) mice received bilateral infusion of the Cre-dependent inhibitory DREADD (hM4Di), or optrode placement together with the excitatory opsin ChR2. Mice received food deprivation by restricting access to two daily meal pellets. Once weight reached ~90% from baseline, Pavlovian training commenced, in which a tone or noise conditioned stimulus (CS+) predicted the delivery of a sucrose solution, whereas a second CS- was unpaired with sucrose delivery. Following a minimum of 2 days of ad-libitum pellet access, mice underwent CPF testing, where the amount of licking for sucrose in the presence of the CS+ and CS- cues was assessed. In both the chemogenetic and optogenetic studies, control mice displayed CPF as evidenced by increased lick rate during the CS+ compared to the CS-. hM4Di-mediated inhibition of LHA MCH cells significantly impaired CPF through disrupting the capacity for the CS+ to increase the mean size of licking bursts, a measure thought to index the orosensory taste properties of sucrose. By contrast, optogenetic stimulation of LHA MCH cells enhanced CPF relative to eYFP-treated controls. Our findings support a critical role for MCH-expressing neurons in the LHA in learned overeating behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.