ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Fully automated system predicts osteoporotic vertebral fracture across institutions using lumbar MRI paraspinal muscle signatures.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paraspinal muscle (PM) degeneration is a crucial yet frequently overlooked risk factor for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). We developed PM Segmentation and Classification of OVF (PMSAC-OVF), a fully automated, multi-institutional system that segments lumbar PMs on MRI, extracts federated learning (FL) and radiomics features, and integrates them with clinical variables for OVF prediction. Leveraging a vision foundation model framework, the system enables privacy-preserving, cross-institutional training and lightweight local deployment. Data from 2,884 patients across five institutions (2014-2024) were analyzed. The automated segmentation module demonstrated expert-level accuracy (Dice coefficient: 0.952, Intersection over Union: 0.909) while reducing processing time to seconds. For prediction, FL and radiomics models yielded pooled AUCs of 0.827 (range: 0.819-0.861) and 0.803 (0.793-0.892), respectively. Trimodal models integrating radiomics signatures (RS), FL signatures (FLS), and clinical variables achieved a pooled AUC of 0.840 (0.822-0.916), significantly outperforming clinical-only models (AUC: 0.742, 0.641-0.778). SHapley Additive exPlanations identified RS, FLS, and bone mineral density as the top predictors, highlighting the complementary value of image-derived features. PMSAC-OVF provides a robust, interpretable, and scalable solution for OVF prediction in heterogeneous clinical settings, potentially facilitating early identification and personalized intervention for high-risk individuals.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.