Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243548›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2026

Spinal cord stimulation for upper limb motor function in people with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a feasibility trial.

Roberto M de Freitas, Shovan Bhatia, Erynn Sorensen, Nikhil Verma, Erick Carranza, Scott Ensel, Luigi Borda, Amy Boos, Jeff Goldsmith, Lee E Fisher and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04512690 nacompletednot on this map

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Restoration of Arm and Hand Function in People With Subcortical Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorLee Fisher, PhDRan2021 to 2025Enrolled7ConditionsStroke, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System DiseasesArmsEpidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the cervical spinal cord
NCT07744659 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Poststroke Spasticity: a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Sham-controlled Trial (SCS-PSS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Pins Medical Co., LtdRan2026 to 2027Enrolled92ConditionsSpasticity Post StrokeArmsActive spinal cord stimulation, Sham spinal cord stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Roberto M de FreitasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4169-5692
Shovan BhatiaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-7208
Erynn SorensenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-4132
Nikhil VermaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5533-6887
Erick CarranzaRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-3222
Scott EnselRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Luigi BordaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4670-8530
Amy BoosRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7399-3276
Jeff GoldsmithDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Lee E FisherRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-3119
Daryl P FieldsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Marc P PowellDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shane GordonProcirca Center for Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeffrey BalzerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Robert M FriedlanderDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-7592
George F WittenbergRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Peter C GersztenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
John W KrakauerDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-1846
Elvira PirondiniRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8078-3951
Douglas J WeberDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. dougweber@cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-3497
Marco CapogrossoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. mcapo@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-316X

Funding

Spinal Cord Stimulation to Improve Motor Function in People with Post-Stroke HemiplegiaUG3NS123135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CAPOGROSSO, MARCO, WEBER, DOUGLAS J · 2022 to 2024
$4.7M
Spinal Cord Stimulation to Improve Motor Function in People with Post-Stroke HemiplegiaUH3NS123135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Marco Capogrosso, Douglas J Weber · 2025 to 2026
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS123135NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS123135U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) UG3NS123135-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic arm and hand hemiparesis is a major cause of disability after stroke. Unfortunately, standard-of-care rehabilitation falls well short of the high doses required to experience improvements. In this feasibility study, we explored the use of cervical epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to assist motor function and provide meaningful functional improvements without the need of a high-dose rehabilitation program. Here we report the final outcomes of this study testing safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of cervical SCS as a neuroprosthetic approach for chronic post-stroke upper limb hemiparesis. We implanted seven participants with profound motor deficits (Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores 15-35) using two leads implanted unilaterally in the cervical spinal cord for 4 weeks. No serious adverse events occurred. Under SCS ON, motor function immediately improved regardless of impairment severity (average +32% strength and +5.6 FMA points). Notably, three of seven participants with residual corticospinal connectivity to finger muscles improved hand/finger movement with SCS. Despite performing only 8.6 hours of motor activity (5.5 hours with SCS ON), participants improved by an average of +6.6 FMA points at the end of the study compared to baseline, and spasticity decreased in all participants. Although all benefited, our preliminary analysis indicates that spared sensory function may be a determinant of responsiveness to SCS. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the safety, feasibility and efficacy of cervical SCS for chronic post-stroke hemiparesis, suggesting its potential as a fully implantable neuroprosthetic solution for assisting upper limb function in daily living. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04512690 .

Indexed as

ParesisSpinal Cord StimulationStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42243548
PMCPMC13366511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.