Trial reportNature medicine2026
Spinal cord stimulation for upper limb motor function in people with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a feasibility trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Restoration of Arm and Hand Function in People With Subcortical Stroke
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Poststroke Spasticity: a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Sham-controlled Trial (SCS-PSS)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Spinal cord stimulation modulates post-synaptic inhibition to improve arm neuromotor control after chronic stroke.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Cervical spinal cord stimulation disrupts proprioception yet improves voluntary arm reaching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Functional Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic arm and hand hemiparesis is a major cause of disability after stroke. Unfortunately, standard-of-care rehabilitation falls well short of the high doses required to experience improvements. In this feasibility study, we explored the use of cervical epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to assist motor function and provide meaningful functional improvements without the need of a high-dose rehabilitation program. Here we report the final outcomes of this study testing safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of cervical SCS as a neuroprosthetic approach for chronic post-stroke upper limb hemiparesis. We implanted seven participants with profound motor deficits (Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores 15-35) using two leads implanted unilaterally in the cervical spinal cord for 4 weeks. No serious adverse events occurred. Under SCS ON, motor function immediately improved regardless of impairment severity (average +32% strength and +5.6 FMA points). Notably, three of seven participants with residual corticospinal connectivity to finger muscles improved hand/finger movement with SCS. Despite performing only 8.6 hours of motor activity (5.5 hours with SCS ON), participants improved by an average of +6.6 FMA points at the end of the study compared to baseline, and spasticity decreased in all participants. Although all benefited, our preliminary analysis indicates that spared sensory function may be a determinant of responsiveness to SCS. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the safety, feasibility and efficacy of cervical SCS for chronic post-stroke hemiparesis, suggesting its potential as a fully implantable neuroprosthetic solution for assisting upper limb function in daily living. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04512690 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.