Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42243652›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

Multi-omics network inference with a Gaussian copula model.

Ekaterina Tomilina, Gildas Mazo, Florence Jaffrézic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ekaterina TomilinaUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Gildas MazoUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Florence JaffrézicUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France. florence.jaffrezic@inrae.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInferring partial correlation networks is essential in systems biology to uncover direct interactions between biological entities. Traditional Gaussian graphical models rely on the assumption of normally distributed data; this assumption is not satisfied when dealing with multi-omics datasets comprising heterogeneous data types such as continuous and discrete variables.

resultsWe propose a novel likelihood-based approach for network inference using a Gaussian copula model with semiparametric pairwise-likelihood estimation of the latent correlation matrix. The inferred correlation structure is then inverted and regularized via the graphical lasso to recover latent partial correlations. Compared to a moment-based approach employing bridge functions, our method demonstrates significantly improved computational efficiency and estimation accuracy, particularly for discrete data with many categories and/or large values, such as count data. This result is important for biological applications, especially for the integration of RNA-seq count data. An application to a breast cancer data set from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) successfully identified biologically relevant interactions.

conclusionsThe proposed approach, based on the Gaussian copula and likelihood-based estimation, provides a novel, effective and computationally efficient mathematical framework for integrative multi-omics data analysis and network inference.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMultiomicsAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLikelihood FunctionsNormal DistributionSystems BiologyGaussian copulaGraphical lassoMulti-omics dataPartial correlation networks

Identifiers

PMID42243652
PMCPMC13465878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.