ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for social isolation in patients with colorectal cancer after stoma surgery.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review on social isolation in patients with intestinal stomas.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the current status and influencing factors of social alienation in patients with enterostomy after colorectal cancer surgery, and to establish a risk prediction model for social alienation in this population.
methodsA total of 507 enterostomy patients treated in the General Surgery (Colorectal Division), Oncology Department, and Wound Ostomy Clinic of a tertiary hospital in Jinzhou from March 2025 to January 2026 were enrolled by convenience sampling. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Risk factors were screened by LASSO regression combined with Logistic regression. Five machine learning algorithms, including Logistic regression (LG), support vector machine (SVM), naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were employed to establish prediction models for social alienation. The predictive performance was evaluated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model fitness and clinical utility.
resultsAmong 507 included patients, 211 developed social alienation, with a prevalence rate of 41.6%. The SVM model achieved the optimal performance among the five models, with an AUC of 0.835 (95%CI: 0.772-0.899), sensitivity of 0.698, accuracy of 0.782, precision of 0.759, specificity of 0.841, and F1-score of 0.727. The calibration curve indicated favorable consistency between predicted and observed probabilities. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a χ
conclusionThe SVM model shows superior performance in predicting the risk of social alienation in enterostomy patients after colorectal cancer surgery and can serve as a screening tool for early identification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.