Evidence mapPaperPMID 42243744Full record

SynthesisBMC neurology2026

Blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a current systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Jaiyeoba-Ojigho Jennifer Efe, Ese Anibor, Priyanka Pandey, Oladipo Gabriel Sunday, David Chinaecherem Innocent, Precious Ebube Anyakorah, Okolie Ikechukwu Emmanuel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaiyeoba-Ojigho Jennifer EfeDepartment of Human Anatomy, Delta State University, Delta State, Nigeria.
Ese AniborDepartment of Human Anatomy, Delta State University, Delta State, Nigeria.
Priyanka PandeyDepartment of Anatomy, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, India.
Oladipo Gabriel SundayDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
David Chinaecherem InnocentCenticini Research Lab, Centicini Team LTD, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria. davidinnocent@centicini.com.
Precious Ebube AnyakorahCenticini Research Lab, Centicini Team LTD, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Okolie Ikechukwu EmmanuelDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in the world and its prevalence is increasing and it has important public health consequences. Early diagnosis remains challenging due to reliance on costly and invasive methods such as positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Blood-based biomarkers have emerged as a promising, less invasive alternatives to identify AD pathology, especially in the early and preclinical stages. This systematic review aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease.

methodsAn extensive literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on studies published since 2010 up to March 2026. The search strategies involved the use of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and free-text words associated with Alzheimer disease, blood-based biomarkers, and diagnostic accuracy. Peer-reviewed diagnostic accuracy studies focused on adult populations were included in line with PICO framework. The selection of studies was based on PRISMA guidelines and were critically appraised using QUADAS-2. Because of heterogeneity across the included studies, synthesis of findings was carried out using a narrative approach.

resultsSix studies were included in this review. Diagnostic performance of phosphorylated tau biomarkers (p-tau181 and p-tau217) was consistently high (AUC up to 0.93), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) also showed strong performance (AUC up to 0.87). Amyloid-β ratios (Aβ42/Aβ40) showed moderate to high accuracy, especially in preclinical detection, but had varying performance across assays (AUC 0.69-0.94). Neurofilament light chain (NfL) demonstrated moderate diagnostic value (AUC of up to 0.79) and was more predictive of progression than an early diagnosis. Combinations of biomarkers, especially those that included genetic variables like APOE genotype, were consistently more effective than individual biomarkers (AUC up to 0.92).

conclusionBiomarkers in blood, especially p-tau and GFAP, have a strong potential for early detection of Alzheimer disease, with their combination yielding better results. Although promising, assay variation and lack of standardisation hinder clinical translation. To facilitate their integration into standard diagnostic practice further large-scale validation and harmonisation effort is required.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersAmyloid beta-PeptidesEarly DiagnosisGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumanstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteintau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid-beta (Aβ42/Aβ40)Blood-based biomarkersDiagnostic accuracyEarly diagnosisGlial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)Neurofilament light chain (NfL)Phosphorylated tau (p-tau)QUADAS-2Systematic review

Identifiers

PMID42243744
PMCPMC13455272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.