ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Therapist perspectives on the clinical utility of hand performance information from at-home egocentric video in outpatient neurorehabilitation: a multi-methods evaluation study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Video summarization for home-based egocentric footage in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRestoring hand function is a primary focus of rehabilitation after neurological injuries, such as stroke and spinal cord injury. However, monitoring hand use outside the clinic remains challenging. This study aims to evaluate how therapists perceive and would utilise information from a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that uses egocentric video to monitor patients' hand use at home.
methodsFive patient-therapist dyads were recruited. Patients recorded daily activities using head-mounted cameras. Therapists reviewed dashboards of processed video data from their patients and completed semi-structured interviews and structured questionnaires. A multi-methods approach with thematic analysis was used to evaluate the CDSS's clinical usefulness.
resultsQualitative analyses revealed four main themes: therapists strongly preferred observational video data over quantitative metrics, valued insights into home environments that cannot be captured in-clinic, identified ways the information could tailor therapy to real-world activities, but noted practical implementation challenges including time constraints and patient burden. The system achieved high usability scores (mean SUS: 80.0, 85-89th percentile).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of using egocentric video to inform clinical decision-making in neurorehabilitation, particularly for hand function. The strong preference for video over metrics suggests clinical decision support systems should prioritize interpretable, observation-based information aligned with clinical reasoning processes. Despite implementation challenges, therapists across technical familiarity levels expressed trust in the system and willingness to use it regularly. These findings indicate that egocentric video systems can bridge the clinic-home divide when designed to match interest-holder priorities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.