ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe operating room (OR) is a complex, high-stress environment in which crisis situations place considerable demands on staff and compromise patient care. Despite the availability of crisis management training, existing research has predominantly relied on objective measures of effectiveness rather than examining nurses' perceived preparedness to manage crises.
aimThis study aims to explore nurses' perceptions of crisis management in the OR, specifically what they perceive as a crisis situation, and which crises they consider important but feel insufficiently prepared to manage. Examining these dimensions allows for the identification of crisis situations representing priority areas for OR nurses' training.
methodsThis exploratory qualitative study used focus group interviews with certified nurse anaesthetists, perioperative nurses, and nurse educators from anaesthesia and perioperative nursing programmes. Seven focus groups were analysed using qualitative content analysis, using an inductive approach with limited quantification.
resultsFive categories of crisis situations were identified: (1) interpersonal dynamics; (2) staffing and equipment constraints; (3) errors or incidents during the care process; (4) unexpected external events; and (5) deterioration in the patient's condition. Participants reported feeling least prepared to manage interpersonal conflicts, emotional demands, and unexpected external events.
conclusionThis study identifies two critical training gaps. First, while nurses receive substantial training in procedural and technical crisis management, they perceive a significant lack of nontechnical skills training, particularly regarding interpersonal dynamics. Second, training related to low-frequency, high-impact crises appears insufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.