ArticleClinical physiology and functional imaging2026
Stress native mapping does not distinguish patients with previous myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries from healthy volunteers.
Article in Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsPatients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) may be affected by coronary microvascular dysfunction with reduced stress perfusion. Changes in native T1 and T2 reflect changes in myocardial perfusion; therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate whether non-contrast, adenosine stress native T1 and T2 are affected in patients with previous suspected MINOCA. METHODS AND
resultsPatients with MINOCA and a normal CMR (n = 15, 59 ± 7 years, 60% female) underwent 1.5T CMR together with age- and sex-matched volunteers. The protocol included native T1, native T2 and quantitative perfusion mapping, at rest and during adenosine stress. Myocardial stress perfusion was globally reduced, both transmurally (2.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7 mL/min/g, p = 0.02) and in the subendocardium (2.64 ± 0.81 vs. 3.47 ± 0.78 ml/min/g, p = 0.008) in patients with MINOCA, with a reduced global ratio of subendocardial-to-transmural stress perfusion (0.921 ± 0.042 vs 0.957 ± 0.039, p = 0.021). However, there were no differences in global transmural rest native T1 or T2, stress native T1 or T2, or ΔT1- or ΔT2 values between patients and volunteers. Overall, transmural myocardial perfusion correlated with native T1 (R
conclusionsNative T1- and T2-mapping during adenosine stress, although correlated with quantitative myocardial perfusion, are not alone sufficiently sensitive methods for distinguishing patients with MINOCA and reduced stress perfusion from healthy volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.