ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Translating B-Cell and Plasma-Cell Targeting from Oncology to Autoimmunity: Modalities, Quantitative Bridging, and a Development Roadmap.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
B cells drive B-cell malignancies and diverse autoimmune diseases through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, and cytokine dysregulation, and persistence of pathogenic B-cell or plasma-cell compartments. Across autoimmune diseases, the dominant pathogenic compartment varies, ranging from precursor-dependent states to tissue-compartment inflammation and long-lived plasma cell-weighted autoantibody production. This review synthesizes the biological rationale for B-cell-axis targeting across oncology and autoimmunity and proposes a pathobiological framework spanning precursor-dependent, compartment-dominant, and long-lived plasma cell-weighted archetypes. We outline the mechanisms, lineage coverage, depletion depth, durability, and tolerability of CD20-, CD19-, CD38-, and BCMA-directed antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and map these modalities onto biologically defined autoimmune archetypes. We also compare dosing paradigms, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), exposure-response relationships, and safety trade-offs between oncology-style induction and chronic maintenance in autoimmunity, emphasizing biomarker-guided retreatment, infection-risk mitigation, and regimen adaptation for non-malignant disease. Clinically, therapies developed for lymphoma and myeloma have transformed B-cell cancer care and are now being repurposed for rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, IgG4-related disease, myasthenia gravis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and related disorders. We summarize pivotal translational inflection points, from rituximab extension beyond lymphoma to approvals of ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab, and inebilizumab in neuroimmunology. We further review plasma cell-directed and T-cell-engaging strategies for deep immune resets in refractory disease, while clarifying implications for trial design, long-term safety, and implementation. Finally, we introduce a model-informed roadmap integrating population PK/PD, exposure-response, and quantitative systems pharmacology to optimize indication selection, patient enrichment, and dose/regimen design-supporting confident extrapolation rather than empiricism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.