ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Protein Predictors of Worsening Cerebral Edema in Traumatic Brain Injury in Critically Ill Patients.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral edema (CE) is a major determinant of poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI). CE affects approximately 60% of patients with mass lesions on head computed tomography (hCT) and confers a tenfold increase in mortality. Despite this burden, no validated biomarkers exist to identify patients at risk for early CE worsening or to elucidate the biological processes underlying divergent edema trajectories. We conducted high-throughput plasma proteomic profiling in a prospective moderate-severe TBI cohort with evidence of intracranial blood on the initial post-injury hCT scan (n=123 patients) to (1) identify a clinically feasible set of biomarkers plus a predictive model that could be used to assess CE risk at admission, and (2) conduct a mechanistic, hypothesis-generating analysis to identify the molecular networks involved in CE progression in the first hours post-injury. Plasma collected within 3 hours of injury was analyzed using the Olink Explore platform (5394 proteins), and patients underwent head CT imaging upon presentation and at 6 hours. Two complementary analytic pathways, reflecting the study's two goals, were pursued in parallel. First, logistic regression with false discovery rate (FDR) correction identified a conservative 12-protein set associated with baseline CE. When combined with targeted clinical variables (i.e., age, sex, admission GCS, pupil reactivity, admission glucose, admission alcohol), this panel supported high-performing supervised classifiers for predicting CE worsening by 6 hours post-baseline scan (best model: XGBoost, AUC = 0.78; recall = 0.83). Second, a broader 60-protein panel, selected via bootstrapped elastic-net regression, was used to interrogate the mechanistic architecture of CE worsening using random forest SHAP attribution and protein-protein interaction modeling. Proteomic signatures diverged sharply between patients whose CE did and did not worsen. The CE worsening group was characterized by a coherent neuronal-synaptic injury axis dominated by ELAVL4, CEND1, NEFL, NECAB2, GFAP, CHGB, RPH3A, HPCAL4, and HOMER1, proteins involved in neuronal structural integrity, vesicular trafficking, synaptic vesicle cycling, calcium signaling, and axonal degeneration. These reciprocal proteomic states suggest that early edema progression may be driven by coordinated disruption of neuronal and synaptic resilience programs. Together, these findings suggest (1) a hyperacute biomarker panel plus predictive model with potential for prospective validation and (2) mechanistic evidence for a distinct neuronal-synaptic injury network that associates with early edema worsening after TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.