Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244891›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Production of dehydrated cabbage on an industrial scale: A comparative evaluation of quality, nutritional, and chemical components.

Chengcheng Zhang, Lihao Jiang, Jiali Li, Daqun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengcheng ZhangCollege of Food and Health, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
Lihao JiangFood Science Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Jiali LiFood Science Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Daqun LiuCollege of Food and Health, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drying is widely used in industrial cabbage processing. Here, different drying methods were applied for the production of dehydrated cabbage on industrial scale. The microwave-assisted hot air drying (MW + HAD) treatment produced superior quality, as reflected in improved color, hardness, and rehydration raThese authors have contributed equally to this work.tio, and also showed higher retention of chlorophyll A, free amino acids, total phenol content, and antioxidant capacity compared to individual hot air drying (HAD) or microwave drying (MD). Our findings revealed 98 volatile compounds across all samples, with aldehydes the most predominant in dehydrated cabbage. Notably, MW + HAD increased both diversity (93 vs. 71 compounds) and content (1336.01 vs. 719.08 μg/100 g) of volatile flavor compounds compared with conventional HAD. Non-targeted metabolomics identified 42,028 metabolite ions, with greater release and generation of cinnamic acids and derivatives, triterpenoids, and alkaloids in thermal drying treatments (HAD, MD, and MW + HAD) compared with freeze drying. Overall, MW + HAD provides clear benefits for maintaining cabbage quality and its nutritional and volatile constituents, supporting its use as an effective industrial drying method.

Indexed as

CabbageHot air dryingMicrowave-assisted hot air dryingMicrowave dryingNutritional and chemical componentsQuality

Identifiers

PMID42244891
PMCPMC13231013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.