ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Production of dehydrated cabbage on an industrial scale: A comparative evaluation of quality, nutritional, and chemical components.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drying is widely used in industrial cabbage processing. Here, different drying methods were applied for the production of dehydrated cabbage on industrial scale. The microwave-assisted hot air drying (MW + HAD) treatment produced superior quality, as reflected in improved color, hardness, and rehydration raThese authors have contributed equally to this work.tio, and also showed higher retention of chlorophyll A, free amino acids, total phenol content, and antioxidant capacity compared to individual hot air drying (HAD) or microwave drying (MD). Our findings revealed 98 volatile compounds across all samples, with aldehydes the most predominant in dehydrated cabbage. Notably, MW + HAD increased both diversity (93 vs. 71 compounds) and content (1336.01 vs. 719.08 μg/100 g) of volatile flavor compounds compared with conventional HAD. Non-targeted metabolomics identified 42,028 metabolite ions, with greater release and generation of cinnamic acids and derivatives, triterpenoids, and alkaloids in thermal drying treatments (HAD, MD, and MW + HAD) compared with freeze drying. Overall, MW + HAD provides clear benefits for maintaining cabbage quality and its nutritional and volatile constituents, supporting its use as an effective industrial drying method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.