ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Understanding access to novel high-cost cancer therapies across Canada: a national survey of pediatric oncology providers.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many evidence-informed high-cost therapies for childhood cancer, including targeted drugs, proton beam therapy (PBT), and cellular therapy (CT) are not publicly funded in Canada. This study aimed to identify disparities and barriers to access, and key health policy changes to improve access to high-cost therapies for children. Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional vignette-based survey among pediatric oncology providers at 16 Canadian pediatric oncology centres. Vignettes explored access to evidence-informed but not universally funded therapies: blinatumomab for low-risk relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), larotrectinib for TRK-fused soft tissue sarcoma, PBT for unresectable head-and-neck sarcoma, and tisagenlecleucel for first relapse of B-ALL in a patient with Down syndrome. The primary outcome was access to each therapy, defined as the patient's ability to receive the specified therapy; secondary outcomes included time to access, funding sources, and perceived barriers. Results: Seventy participants were enrolled from 15 centres, with 68 (response rate = 97%) completing at least one survey question. Most respondents were pediatric medical oncologists (31/68, 45.6%). Provider-reported access rates were 89% for blinatumomab ( Conclusions: Access to evidence-informed cancer therapies for Canadian children remains variable. Universal funding, simplified approval processes, and the establishment of Canadian PBT centres to reduce travel burden, would ensure timely, equitable access to high-cost therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.