SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Group-based psychosocial interventions reduce internalized stigma in psychiatric disorders: ISMI-focused systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internalized stigma negatively impacts recovery outcomes, quality of life, and self-concept among individuals with psychiatric diagnoses. Group-based psychosocial interventions have been proposed as effective stigma-reduction strategies, but their impact across diverse populations remains under-evaluated. Objective: This systematic review synthesizes global evidence on the effectiveness of group-based interventions in reducing internalized stigma in adult psychiatric populations, with a focus on studies using the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science, and additionally screened full-text platforms (SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, SAGE Journals, and Wiley Online Library), for studies published between 2003 and 2025. Inclusion criteria required adult psychiatric populations, group-based interventions, and internalized stigma as a primary outcome. Study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers (US and GOC). Results: Ten studies [n= 1,088], across five countries, met inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials and pre-post designs. Most studies reported significant reductions in ISMI scores post-intervention, particularly in the domains of stereotype endorsement and social withdrawal. Culturally adapted interventions in China, Poland, and Spain demonstrated feasibility and impact, though subscale reliability varied regionally. Conclusion: Group-based psychosocial interventions may help reduce internalized stigma in psychiatric populations within an ISMI-based evidence base. The ISMI scale is, to this day, among the most frequently used instrument, though cultural adaptation of subscales such as stigma resistance remains a concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.