Evidence mapPaperPMID 42245213Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Lifestyle, psychological and demographic predictors of anxiety: insights from a large-scale survey and machine learning analysis.

Dur E Nishwa, Zeeshan Abbas, Seung Won Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dur E NishwaDepartment of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Zeeshan AbbasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of IT Convergence, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Seung Won LeeDepartment of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Anxiety is influenced by a combination of lifestyle, psychological, and demographic factors. This study aimed to evaluate these associations and explore the potential of machine learning in predicting anxiety severity. Methods: Anxiety levels were evaluated using a large survey-based dataset of 11, 000 adults alongside demographic, physiological, and psychological measures. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS to identify associations between key variables. Several machine learning regression algorithms, including linear, regularized, and ensemble models, were implemented in Python to predict anxiety levels. Model performance was evaluated using standard error metrics. Results: Our findings revealed significant associations of anxiety with stress and sleep duration, while demographic attributes such as family history of anxiety and occupation also influenced outcomes. Ensemble machine learning algorithms achieved superior performance compared to single and linear-model approaches. Feature importance analysis identified stress, sleep, and caffeine intake as top predictors of anxiety. Conclusions: The integration of statistical approaches with machine learning applications highlights the multifactorial nature of anxiety and demonstrates the potential of predictive modeling in mental health care. Future research should emphasize longitudinal designs and the incorporation of biological and digital markers to enhance clinical applicability and prediction.

Indexed as

anxietylifestyle factorsmachine learningsleep durationstress

Identifiers

PMID42245213
PMCPMC13230050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.