ArticleCureus2026
Trends in Inpatient Psychiatry Referrals: A Retrospective Study of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Services.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted healthcare delivery, including consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) services, by altering patient profiles and referral dynamics. Understanding these changes is crucial for optimizing mental health care within general hospital settings. This study aimed to compare the pattern of CLP referrals among inpatients during the pre-COVID and post-COVID periods. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India. Data from inpatients referred to the CLP team during March-August 2019 (pre-COVID) and March-August 2022 (post-COVID) were analyzed. Six months was selected because the number of referrals to CLP is relatively low, and a longer duration was required to obtain a meaningful sample size for analysis. Accordingly, we included approximately six months of data from the pre-COVID period and used a comparable timeframe from another year during the pandemic to ensure consistency and allow for valid comparison. Socio-demographic variables, referral sources, psychiatric diagnoses, family history, and comorbid physical illnesses were compared using the chi-square test. Results A total of 285 patients were included in the study. The number of patients seen by the CLP team increased from 107 in the pre-COVID period to 178 in the post-COVID period, representing a 66.4% increase. There was a significant shift in age distribution (p-value = 0.011), with a decrease in patients aged >60 years in the post-COVID period (56 (52.3%) to 57 (32%), p-value = 0.011). Referral patterns shifted, with increased referrals from emergency (7 (6.5%) to 23 (12.9%)) and general medicine (13 (12.1%) to 39 (21.9%)), and decreased referrals from accidents and trauma (16 (15%) to 7 (3.9%), p-value = 0.007). Delirium showed a substantial rise (8 (7.5%) to 54 (30.3%)), while mood disorders (14 (13.1%) to 13 (7.3%)) and psychotic disorders (16 (15%) to 16 (9%)) declined (p-value = 0.0006). Family history of psychiatric illness remained largely unchanged. Conclusion The study demonstrates important shifts in psychiatry referral patterns and patient characteristics following the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings highlight the need for flexible and responsive CLP services within hospital settings. They also provide useful insights for planning mental health services and strengthening preparedness for future public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.