ReviewMolecular medicine reports2026
Beyond the primary site: Molecular insights and clinical implications of cancer metastatic overlap between lung and urological organ cancers (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastasis between primary lung cancers and urological malignancies, for example prostate, renal and bladder cancers, poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Previous epidemiological data underscore a frequent bidirectional overlap that adversely affects patient survival. This review synthesizes current molecular insights and clinical implications of this metastatic crosstalk, delineating how these distinct tumor types exploit shared molecular toolkits, including the C‑X‑C chemokine receptor 4/C‑X‑C motif chemokine ligand 12 axis, hepatocyte growth factor/mesenchymal‑epithelial transition factor signaling and epithelial‑mesenchymal plasticity, to facilitate dissemination and colonization. The distinct immune contextures and cellular architectures of the metastatic niche in different organs have also been explored, revealing their notable influence on therapeutic responses. Although molecular profiling and liquid biopsies have been refining diagnostic precision and allowing for a shift toward mechanism‑centric agnostic therapies, organ‑specific microenvironments continue to modulate drug efficacy. Integration of these insights is necessary for advancing personalized management strategies and improving outcomes for patients in this complex clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.