ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Influence of Menopause on Mechanical Properties of Pelvic Floor and Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authors' Reply to Comment on "Influence of Menopause on Mechanical Properties of Pelvic Floor and Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study".International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Comment on "Influence of Menopause on Mechanical Properties of Pelvic Floor and Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study".International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMenopause is associated with physiological changes that could alter the muscle mechanical properties (MMPs) of the pelvic floor (PF). This study aimed to investigate the influence of menopause on the mechanical properties of lumbopelvic muscles, with PF muscles as the primary outcome and lumbar paravertebral muscles as a secondary outcome, comparing postmenopausal and premenopausal women while adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI).
methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted involving 20 postmenopausal and 20 premenopausal women aged 45-65 years. MMPs, that is, frequency (tone), stiffness, decrement (inverse of elasticity), and viscoelastic properties (relaxation time of stress, and creep, that represents fluidity), were bilaterally assessed at the PF and lumbar paravertebral level using a device measuring MMPs (MyotonPRO). Sociodemographic and clinical variables (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 questionnaires) were also recorded. Between groups comparisons were performed, according to data distribution, and analysis of covariance, adjusted by age and BMI as covariates, were applied to all MMPs of both regions.
resultsPostmenopausal women showed significantly higher values for frequency (1.25 Hz, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.26, 2.23]) and stiffness (40.20 N/m, 95% CI [5.74, 74.66]) on the left side of PF. However, frequency differences were no longer significant after adjustment for age and BMI and left-side stiffness remained associated with age rather than BMI. In contrast, premenopausal women exhibited significantly greater viscoelastic properties at both sides, independently of age and BMI. No significant differences were observed in the MMPs of the lumbar paravertebral muscles (p > 0.05).
conclusionsMMPs of the PF differed between postmenopausal and premenopausal women. After adjustment for age and BMI, group differences were attenuated; viscoelastic parameters remained different between groups, while increased PF stiffness appeared primarily age-related. No influence by menopausal status was observed at the lumbar level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42246957What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.