ArticlePloS one2026
Genomic insights into population structure and adaptive variation of Pimelodus yuma and Pimelodus grosskopfii in the Magdalena-Cauca Basin.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biodiversity of the Magdalena-Cauca Basin, Colombia's main fluvial system, is under severe threat from anthropogenic activities, imperiling endemic fish species such as Pimelodus yuma and Pimelodus grosskopfii. Using a population genomic approach based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we analyzed 64 individuals of P. grosskopfii and 57 individuals of P. yuma collected across ~1,600 km of the Magdalena-Cauca Basin. We identified two coexisting genetic stocks in both species, maintained by restricted gene flow that is associated with adaptive divergence rather than geographic distribution. Selection pressures, likely linked to the basin's bimodal hydrological regime, were detected as major drivers of genetic structure. Historical demographic reconstruction analyses indicate that stock 1 in both P. grosskopfii and P. yuma was established in the basin during the Late Miocene-Pliocene (~4.5-5.5 MYA), with P. grosskopfii exhibiting an early expansion followed by long-term stability up to the present, while P. yuma maintained a stable population size until a recent decline. Stock 2 in both species was established during the Early Pleistocene (~1.7-2.5 MYA), followed by expansion and stability in P. grosskopfii, and a stable population size followed by a contraction-recovery-expansion dynamic in P. yuma, suggesting long-term persistence of neutral/adaptive processes shaping these stocks. Each stock should be considered a Management and Adaptive Unit, highlighting the need for targeted conservation actions and broader strategies to ensure their persistence under ongoing environmental and anthropogenic pressures in the Magdalena-Cauca Basin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.