ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Assessing alcohol consumption in an era of direct alcohol markers.
Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are the leading causes of advanced liver disease worldwide. The introduction of the steatotic liver disease (SLD) nomenclature, including MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, has increased the need for accurate assessment of alcohol consumption, as disease classification, prognosis, and management depend partly on alcohol exposure. Although structured interviews and validated questionnaires such as AUDIT and AUDIT-C remain standard tools, self-reported alcohol intake is limited by recall bias, underreporting, and variability in drinking patterns. This has led to growing interest in direct alcohol biomarkers that objectively reflect recent alcohol exposure. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on direct alcohol biomarkers, with particular focus on phosphatidylethanol (PEth), the most widely used alcohol marker in hepatology. We conclude that PEth provides a robust and clinically useful measure of recent alcohol consumption, but that its interpretation is influenced by biological variability and context. Importantly, currently used cut-offs are not firmly anchored to clinical outcomes and should not be applied mechanically to classify SLD subtypes. Instead, biomarker-derived measures and self-reported alcohol use should be regarded as complementary tools, best integrated in a longitudinal and clinically contextualised assessment of alcohol exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.