ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Unraveling microbial signatures in the comorbidity of autoimmune diseases and depression.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a common comorbidity in autoimmune diseases (ADs), including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a well-characterized AD with prominent gut involvement and strong host-microbiome interactions. Yet, its underlying microbial associations remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to explore the gut microbial composition and function in patients with ADs comorbid depression, including a subgroup with IBD comorbid depression, and to identify potential microbial and metabolic signatures associated with this comorbidity.
methodsWe analyzed two curated cohorts from the American Gut Project: an AD cohort (n = 344; AD with depression: n = 115, AD without depression: n = 120, healthy controls: n = 109), and an IBD subgroup (n = 75; IBD with depression: n = 25, IBD without depression: n = 30, healthy controls: n = 20). Gut microbial profiles were evaluated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (V4 region). Microbial diversity was assessed via α- and β-diversity indices. Differential abundance analysis was conducted using Linear Discriminative Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) methods. Functional predictions were performed based on Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthology inference. Microbial co-occurrence networks were also constructed to explore taxonomic interaction patterns.
resultsIn the AD cohort, β-diversity was significantly reduced in patients with comorbid depression compared to those without, whereas α-diversity did not show statistically significant differences. A total of 40 microbial taxa were significantly different between patients with AD comorbid depression and AD without depression. In the IBD subgroup, 12 taxa were differentially abundant between patients with and without depression. Functional pathway predictions suggested disruptions in carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, and glycan biosynthesis in patients with AD and comorbid depression compared to those without depression. Microbial network analysis revealed distinct co-occurrence structures in patients with comorbid depression.
conclusionsThis exploratory study suggests that individuals with ADs or IBD and comorbid depression exhibit distinct gut microbiome compositions and functional potentials compared to non-depressed counterparts. These associations may offer insights into gut-brain interactions in autoimmunity and mental health. However, due to the cross-sectional design, mechanistic and clinical inferences remain speculative and require validation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.