ReviewMolecular cancer2026
Deconstructing cancer in 3D: models, mechanisms, and personalized solutions.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cancer models, notably patient-derived organoids (PDOs), address the critical limitations of traditional preclinical systems, including two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), by better recapitulating physiological tumor architecture and patient-specific heterogeneity, thereby revolutionizing oncology research. We chart the complementary technological landscape, from high-fidelity PDOs and scalable spheroids to engineered systems that reconstruct the tumor microenvironment (TME) via co-culture, organ-on-a-chip, and 3D bioprinting. Beyond foundational biology, these tools are driving functional precision medicine, where PDO avatars predict clinical drug response, and accelerating drug discovery through physiologically relevant screening. A core focus is their unparalleled utility in modeling therapy resistance, enabling the induction and multi-omic dissection of resistant clones, deconstructing stroma-mediated protection, and testing rational combination therapies to overcome relapse. Despite challenges in standardization and complete TME integration, the convergence of 3D models with single-cell omics, CRISPR screening, and artificial intelligence heralds a new era of predictive oncology. Ultimately, rigorous validation and clinical translation of these models promise to bridge the gap between bench and bedside, enabling truly personalized and effective cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.