ArticlePhysiological reports2026
The evidence for old age motor neuron death: A scoping review.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related neuromuscular dysfunction is widely recognized; however, the extent to which aging is accompanied by motor neuron (MN) loss remains underexplored. This review evaluates evidence for MN loss with aging across species and anatomical motor pools. We synthesize PUBMED studies in humans, non-human primates, rats and mice within the spinal cord and brainstem. Attention was given to the methodological approach used to quantify MNs and categorized based on what MNs were quantified (specific pools, vertebral levels, lateral motor columns). Methods were assessed qualitatively, based on stereological and non-stereological density counting approaches, and the staining techniques identified as optimal or suboptimal by defined criteria. To facilitate cross-study comparison we conducted quantitative assessments including: coefficients of variance, percentage differences between groups and standardized effect sizes calculated with Cohen's d. Across species and anatomical regions, the overall literature supports the presence of age-related MN loss. Evidence is strongest in studies using robust counting approaches such as stereology, and appropriate MN markers. As age-related MN degeneration is more heavily investigated and becomes a locus of intervention, future work must employ rigorous methodological standards to accurately determine the extent, regional specificity, and functional consequence of aging MN loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.