ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Cell-free DNA, cytokine, and catecholamine levels did not differ between sexes under a matched body core temperature increase, despite females exhibiting a more rapid increase in rectal temperature.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare cell-free DNA (cfDNA), catecholamine (CAT), and cytokine concentrations and the perceptual responses following rectal temperature-matched hot water immersion (HWI) in females and males.
methodsTwenty-two healthy young adults (9 females, 13 males) underwent HWI (water temperature 43-44 °C) until body rectal temperature (Tre) reached 39 °C. Blood samples to determine cfDNA, CAT, and cytokine concentrations were collected. Thermal perceptions, Tre, and heart rate (HR) were assessed throughout the intervention.
resultsFemales reached each Tre significantly faster than males (p < 0.001) and cooled more quickly during recovery (p = 0.023). HR and the physiological strain index increased similarly in both sexes. cfDNA increased twofold with rising Tre (main effect of time, p < 0.001) and no overall sex difference, although males showed higher values after 30 min of recovery (p = 0.046). Norepinephrine and epinephrine rose significantly during heating (p < 0.001), with no sex differences. Prolactin exhibited a stronger rise in females (sex × time interaction, p < 0.001), whereas tumor necrosis factor-α decreased only in males (p < 0.05). Interleukin-6 increased markedly in both sexes but was higher in males at baseline and early recovery (p < 0.05).
conclusionWhen exposed to matched Tre elevation, females and males showed similar cfDNA, CAT, and perceptual responses, despite females reaching target temperatures faster and cooling more rapidly. These findings highlight cfDNA as a temperature-dependent marker of thermal strain and support its use alongside classical neuroendocrine and immune markers to characterize heat-stress physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42249924What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.